Package: cryptsetup Version: 2:1.1.3-1 Severity: wishlist
Hi Jonas. Not sure whether I've already suggested this and it was just reject... so simply close it if so. We should perhaps consider, to split out the keyscripts in separate packages. I mean e.g. something like: cryptsetup-openct cryptsetup-opensc cryptsetup-openssl etc. (not yet sure about passdev...) Of course one might argue that these (usually) two small scripts are overkill for own packages... but the main benefit I see at the moment is, that each of this minor packages could depend on what it needs, e.g. openssl, openct, and so on. Which is in cryptsetup itsefl not really possible,... as it would be too annyoing to depend on just everything any single keyscript would need. I think, that each such package would have to depend on cryptsetup itself, because most keyscripts and their hook scripts will require it directly (by depending on cryptroot or looking for it in the hookscript) or indirectly (e.g. they use askpass). cryptsetup itself should suggest each such minor package. A minor benefit could be to make /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d/cryptsetup less demanding. I guess we always have to set BUSYBOX=y because cryptroot already needs it, right? But maybe there are keyscripts which do not strictly need KEYMAP=y, as they don't require a passphrase or so. This could also make life easier in solving #589641. If the "ugly" solution would be the one to go, one could perhaps make use of triggers. But I must admit that I do not yet fully understand the concept of triggers, and whether they'd actually help us. Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
