On Tuesday 20 July 2010 00:39:26 Bastian Blank wrote: > Only +b\d is a binary rebuild, anything else is not. So this test will > not provide any evidence. However the code is really missing.
Well, in my case I need versions that definitely won't conflict with any official binary packages including binary-only NMU's, in order to avoid confusing apt. (Apt tends to act unpredictably if there are two packages from different repositories with the same version number but different sizes/checksums, which sometimes includes the behavior of wanting to "upgrade" the package to one version every time it runs, but ending up (re)installing the other version instead.) My pbuilder hook script does check a blacklist of packages not to apply the +pb\d version to, but I prefer to keep it minimal -- right now it only has linux-2.6, linux-kbuild-2.6, and dh-make-perl, and based on your comments I might have to add xen as well. > But for the start, please elaborate the reason for the initial severity. I initially thought from looking at the build log that the problem was a missing Build-Depends on linux-support-2.6.32-5. Sorry I neglected to check the bug against a vanilla pbuilder setup before I filed the bug. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
