On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:48:07PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:31:31PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:40:50PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 08:57:59PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:18:06AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System > > > > wrote: > > > I'd closed the screem version of the bug in the anjuta changelog. Doh!. > > > Even > > > though i'd included the patch in the last anjuta upload. > > > > screem (= scream?)?? > > You submitted an equivalent style bug for screem. I put the wrong bug > number in the changelog.
Ahm, yes. I was confused by screem since I did not recognize that it is a Debian package. I assumed you refer to a misspelled word similar to "wrong" or "bogus" :-) > > There was no new upload together with closing this bug according to > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/anjuta.html. > > The bug was fixed with version 1.2.3-2, which it seems I never uploaded. > No wonder you are confused :) Rest assured that your patch is included > in 1.2.4. Even the new 1.2.4-1 version is not yet in Debian unstable. I checked ftp.debian.org and the above mentioned page (which contains at least the "[2005-08-14] Accepted 1.2.4-1 in unstable (low) (Rob Bradford)" message). Maybe I should be more patient ... > Please let me have an updated patch for 1.2.4 when you're ready. OK, I attached a patch against 1.2.4 from upstream which contain a few more issues. Nevertheless I noticed that the translation is in a bad shape and contains many fuzzy messages. I first tried to update it but I'm too lazy for this large file, it requires additional testing (e.g. the shortcuts should be unique) and since 1.4.x is abandoned it's not very useful. Maybe I will use this project for testing, ... Jens
diff.gz
Description: Binary data
