2010/8/6 Stefan Bühler <[email protected]>:
> You think that a "module-load-list"
> (a, a, b) should be the same as (a, b) - i.e. removing duplicates

> But there is no good way to decide what to do with (a, b, a),
> as (a, b) and (b, a) are really different (order matters);
> and therefore we cannot make module loading "idempotent".

What about not adding a module that's in the list already?

Olaf



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to