Hello,

>>> In Message "Bug#592937: should we keep libapache2-mod-fastcgi?"
>>>            <[email protected]>,
>>> Thijs Kinkhorst <[email protected]>  said;
> We currently have both libapache2-mod-fastcgi and libapache2-mod-fcgid in the 
> archive. This package, mod-fastcgi, has not seen new upstream releases since 
> 2007. Also, anyone I know recommends to use mod_fcgid over mod_fastcgi. Is 
> there a reason to keep mod_fastcgi in the archive and release it with squeeze?

mod_fcgid is a good alternative module to handle FastCGI.
However it have no function to connect to external server currently.
I think it's be needed to keep mod_fastcgi until mod_fcgi implements
external server connectivity.

> If there is such a reason, the package description should describe when to 
> choose which module.

Thanks, I'll do so.

-- 
Tatsuki Sugiura   mailto:[email protected]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to