On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:16PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 06:32:39PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > >> Hello up there! > >> > >> I'm from Debian land where we'll use binutils 2.20 for the next release. > >> > >> However as you've probably already learned from Fedora DSO Link Change, > >> -no-add-needed was breaking cases with weak symbols involved. In particular > >> when linking C++ programs to libraries linked to libpthread.so without > >> -lpthread for program itself was problematic -- See e.g. this thread > >> > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00042.html > ... > >> > >> > >> Things are fixed on binutils trunk, but binutils-2_20-branch still has the > >> problem. > >> > >> Is it somehow possible to please apply fixes to 2.20 too? If yes, I've > >> prepared backported patches, which go as replies to this email. > >> > >> > >> Thanks beforehand, > >> Kirill > > > > Silence ... > > Sorry, I was on holidays.
Tristan, thanks for replying. > This is OK to apply to the branch. Can you do it ? I'm afraid no, because I have no commit rights to binutils CVS. Though if that could help, I've put the patches into binutils-2_20-noaddneeded-vs-weak branch at http://repo.or.cz/w/binutils/kirr.git, so one could do git pull git://repo.or.cz/binutils/kirr.git binutils-2_20-noaddneeded-vs-weak Hope this helps and thanks, Kirill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
