Hi Pino,

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:

> Attached there is a better (working) version of the patch for the reported 
> issue. Sorry for the wrong patch sent previously.

I don't think there's any reason to care about arbitrarily long paths in the
test suite, so I'm going to go with the simpler solution of defining
PATH_MAX to a reasonably large value to keep the test case itself simple.
We can always revisit this if someone ever shows this isn't big enough, but
the same is already done in pam_xauth today.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
[email protected]                                     [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to