On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:11:34AM +0200, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
So if you honestly let me choose, I suggest we simply close this as a non-bug.What do you think of a tagging it wontfix instead of closing it? It will leave a trace for people encountering the problem.
I thought about suggesting it myself, but changed my mind: In my opinion it is a non-bug, not a bug we won't fix.
The "bug" that I won't fix - the one of failing to work due to routinely suppressing recommends expecting that all whould still work smoothly - really should be filed against debian-policy, IMO.
The "bug" in this package is a wishlist request to work out-of-the-box also in the odd situation of someone disliking centrally distributed ca-certificates and therefore suppressing that particular recommendation. If someone wants to work on that, then sure let's lower this bugreport to severity wishlist and retitle it appropriately. But that won't help serve others in same situation as you, I suspect.
Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
