On 01.11.05 Hamish Moffatt (ham...@debian.org) wrote: Dear Hamish,
> Package: tetex-base > Version: 3.0-10 > Severity: normal > > When upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-10, I was asked about my changes to > the file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc through ucf. When I asked to see the > differences against my installed version, the diff was against /dev/null > so every line was new. > > I did not delete the previous version of this file, and did not even > know it existed. This package or another either removed it or failed > to install it. However, I shouldn't have been asked about it. > You filed that bug 5 years ago. Frank searched a while for the problem cause but didn't find anything. Finally we tagged it unreproducible. teTeX base exists only in oldstable, is an transitional package in stable and gone in unstable. I suggest to close that bug now as probably nobody else will see it and we won't be able to debug it further. What do you think? Hilmar -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
