Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 16:23 +1000, Alexander Zangerl a écrit : > On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:54:14 +0200, Olivier Berger writes: > >Ain't this a flaw in the packaging system, > > no, this is purely my own fault: i prefer not to use testing until the very > last few weeks before release, and every now and then i forget to use my > build-relative-to-unstable script instead of a plain dpkg-buildpackage. > > for all my other software this is not a big deal, but python is extremly > painful in that regard. >
Well... if python is sensitive and people make mistakes, the goal of the QA tools are to try and prevent that in principle, hence my idea that this may be a flaw in the build process that could be verified somehow. For instance, if building on stable for a target of unstable and python amond the (build ?) dependencies, etc. Or... we you just promise not to do it again ;) Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <[email protected]> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
