Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have now one machine that is compiling the linux kernel, on an openafs > volume, for 24 hours. Until now I didn't get any error from the > compilation or message from the kernel. That is very good and much > better than with 1.3.81/2 modules. This client have openafs-client from > sarge (1.3.81) and openafs-modules from unstable (1.3.87)
Excellent. Should I go ahead and close this bug as fixed in 1.3.87-1? (I'm guessing that a backport to sarge will be in order at some point, probably via backports.org since I doubt it would meet the criteria for inclusion in stable. Hopefully etch will be fast.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
