On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:43:25AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday, September 12, 2010 05:14:34 am Philipp Kern wrote: > > dansguardian, klamav and libclamunrar are 'ok' I guess, the only other > > candidate for removal was python-clamav, where Scott insisted that > > the removal should 'not be done'. However he also didn't take it > > over (yet?). > I'm still waiting to hear from the release team that it will be left in if I > do. I'm not interested in taking it over unless it will be part of the > release (I think it should be). The current maintainer has agreed to the > change, so let me know and I'll take it over.
It should be maintained, i.e. somebody needs to take care of it. That's all I care about. (Which I hope is fair enough.) So if that's the case it can stay, yes. (However I guess the move to clamd-based products should be made at some point.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
