On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:54:15 +0300, George Kiagiadakis wrote: > >> kbluetooth is transitional for the kbluetooth that was in unstable >> (but never made it into testing). One of the ex-maintainers of >> kbluetooth suggested that I should also add a transitional package for >> it. Their version is just something higher than the last version of >> kbluetooth/kdebluetooth that was in unstable. I did that to avoid >> bumping epoch on bluedevil. Having to modify debian/rules for each >> upload isn't so great, but it's not much hassle either, because I >> don't intend to do any further uploads before squeeze is released and >> after the release I will again drop the transitional packages (well, >> supposing that the release will take some time...). >> > Well I don't see a reason for squeeze to carry the kbluetooth cruft. > And I don't think the way you call dh_gencontrol is acceptable, you > could just pick the version from the changelog and add the epoch instead > of hardcoding it.
Ok, understood, so if I drop the kbluetooth transitional package and generate the version from debian/changelog somehow, would you then unblock it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org