Hi, Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Vincent Fourmond: > Hello, > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m bitten by this bug on a debian lenny+backports installation. And I > > really want to avoid installing software from experimental... :-) > > > > Any chance that this bug fix can be backported to squeeze? > > It's too late for backporting a fix like this from experimental to > squeeze at this point, I don't think it would make it through the > release team, and I would have very little arguments to give.
Fair enough. > However, > I'm willing to upload a backport of 1.0 to squeeze-backports, should > it be necessary. (but I saw you were responsible for the lenny > backports; would you keep on going with them for squeeze ?) I don’t mind. As a matter of fact, I already built it for lenny: http://people.debian.org/~nomeata/fop-lenny/ For it to be accepted in squeeze-backports it would have migrate to testing after the squeeze release first, though. > As of now, fop 1.0 is in experimental to avoid potentially > disturbing package builds, but I don't really think it more unstable > than the current testing/unstable version. Good to know, as it is now installed on the production machine. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
