Hi J&J, Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 07:18 -0700 schrieb John MacFarlane: > Pandoc does use a parser defined in texmath. So if texmath links > against parsec2, and the rest of pandoc links against parsec3 (as > it currently does in the debian package), there might be a problem > there.
Yes, if it uses a parser from the package, then the versions need to mach indeed. > Jonas, have you tried changing the pandoc debian/rules to link against > parsec2? Pandoc 1.6 should work with either version of parsec. > > It seems to me that it would be best if all of these inter-operating > packages linked against the same version of parsec. All three of > them will currently work with either version. Would the maintainer > of texmath consider bumping the build dependency to parsec3? We can bump the dependency in Debian. The other user of texmath, gitit, already links against parsec2, so this is fine. > > >Do you plan to upload pandoc to unstable or experimental? Is it > > >targeted to squeeze? > > > > > >(But no objections to doing the bump, the question is whether we > > >want to do it now in unstable, now in experimental, or after the > > >release in unstable) > > > > It is a new upstream release, so unless John can help raise concern > > about security bugs in older releases, I believe it is too late in > > the game for Squeeze. > > Unfortunately, I don't see any security fixes in the changelog. I wouldn’t call it unfortunate :-) @Jonas: So do you want to upload pandoc to experimental or do you want to wait ’till after the release and upload to unstable? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
