On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:40 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:31:41 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" > > Even ignoring those, the diffstat against the RC1 package is > > 136 files changed, 3004 insertions(+), 1713 deletions(-) > > which is still quite large for an update at this stage of the freeze. > > Yes, I know :/ > RC1 was released before 2009-10-20 and upstream haven't made any release > since then... > So 2.0.0 final release include many bugfixes (ie. one year of bugfixes > :/).
I've now had chance to review the diff; apologies for the delay. It turns out that a lot of the changes are JavaDoc or the reformatting of method headers or calls, although the latter particularly didn't help make the diff more readable. :-/ Having looked through the list of upstream bugfixes, I'd be happy to unblock those, but: > >> * Enable rxtx support: > >> - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java. [...] > > Why was this support not enabled earlier? New dependencies and features > > aren't really appropriate at this stage. > > rxtx feature was not really stable in mina RC1 release, so it was > disabled. > I've re-enabled it for 2.0 as I've successfully tested it locally. > > If this is too much for squeeze, I can disable this rxtx support again as > reverse-depends of mina2 doesn't use this feature. Sorry, but yes, if the feature hasn't been enabled previously and isn't used by any of the r-deps, I'd prefer that it stay disabled for Squeeze. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org