On 2010-11-11 at 16:35:53, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, it's just a plugin of tinymce in need of
> that flash player?  Then couldn't that plugin be moved to non-free (in a
> sepperate source package) so that a tinymce cleaned from this plugin
> could stay in main as well as the other packages?

What we've done upstream for Mahara is that we've removed the media player
from the tinymce source we bundle with Mahara. I suspect that a number of
the other rdeps might be fine with that if they don't use that part of
tinymce.

Moving tinymce to nonfree would likely cause the mahara package to start
using its own flvplayer-free bundled copy again which would be sub-optimal
from a security standpoint.

Has anybody tried to get tinymce to remove flvplayer upstream?

Cheers,
Francois



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to