On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:13:28AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:49:57PM +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ana Guerrero <[email protected]> writes: > > >> Long time ago I read about adept being discontinued [0]. However, a new > > >> version was uploaded a couple of weeks ago with 2 big problems, > > >> it FTBFS (#540648) and it lacks of a real maintainer now , specially > > >> since > > >> the used list is moderated (#540229). Due to this, the package has been > > >> removed today from testing. > > >> I was wondering what are the future plans for adept, specially with > > >> respect > > >> its status for releasing it in Squeeze. > > > Yes, Adept is currently discontinued as far as development goes. But Enrico > > needed to change something about libept which is required to build adept, > > so I > > tried to kick the package into some shape. Due to limited time and broken > > pbuilder, it took a little longer than I'd like, but all RC issues should be > > fixed again now. > > > > Otherwise, when I have time, I'll fix bugs and maybe even add a feature here > > and there. Don't count on anything though, I may disappear without further > > notice again. > > > > Thanks for the answer Petr, if you do not mind, i will leave the bug open as > possible indicator that we might have to remove it for testing when freezing > Squeeze. ok? > Should adept be removed from testing now? Shipping it in stable does not make much sense, right?
-- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
pgpDoK2T7zlc4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
