Hi! Am 08.12.2010 09:33, schrieb dave b:
>> I verified it, and your patch works: I accepts valid ssl connections, >> and rejects invalid ones. At this point I should have also said "many thanks for your work!" Sorry, didn't had a coffee when I wrote my first mail ;) >>> + self.sslobj = ssl_wrap(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile, >>> cert_reqs=ssl.CERT_REQUIRED, ca_certs="/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt") >> >> But that looks kind of ugly, having a hardcoded path... Also, I wonder >> if not self.certfile should be used for verification? > Sorry? > Um. Well sure a hard coded path path not be the best thing ... if you > know how to determine the path to the ca store on a system modify the > patch to use that I guess. Sorry, that was complete nonsense. For a moment I thought one could use the certfile parameter to specify a file holding certs for verification. I take my question back. Sorry for the noise. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
