Hello Christoph, Enrico, and Grant: Thank you all for your bug reports.
On Thursday, June 24, 2004 at 4:05:01 PM +0200, Christoph von Stuckrad wrote:
> I set a limit, which 'just now' results in 'nothing' Correctly I get
> the message "No messages matched criteria." [...] new mail comes in...
> *** THIS *** Mail is shown in the index, but is completely unrelated
> to the limit.
On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 at 7:25:45 PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
>| mutt/1853: Esc+l does not work right when a filter matches no messages
> If I type 'l' ("limit") and then something impossible like
> "safgalskjhe", then no messages are displayed. However, if I type
> Esc+l ("show-limit"), it tells me "No limit pattern is in effect.",
> which is wrong.
On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 6:50:18 AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
>| Bug#242398: limit misrepresentation to user when nothing matches
> Set any limit that matches zero messages. The show-limit function
> <esc>l says "No limit pattern is in effect." [...] The limit pattern
> is NOT put into the header line.
Please check patch-1.5.10.ab.empty_limit.1 uploaded to
<URL:http://bugs.mutt.org/1906>. It completes the previous changes done
around empty limits:
- New mails appear if they match the limit pattern.
- <show-limit> and %V show the current limit pattern.
- %M shows 0 (number of messages matching limit).
- Patterns beginning by ~A but longer are not confused with ~A.
- <limit> and <show-limit> are callable from an empty mailbox.
- <toggle-write> also.
Bye! Alain.
--
How to Report Bugs Effectively
<URL:http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
