On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> reassign 290049 zlib
> severity 290049 wishlist
> notforwarded 290049
> kthxbye
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:43:11PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> reassign 290049 zlib, rsync
>> severity 290049 important
>> forwarded 290049 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6916
>
> This is not the same issue as the code duplication between the two
> packages, this is requesting support in zlib for compressing things in a
> way that happens to reduce the sizes of binary diffs (which is helpful
> for rsync but not by any means excusive to rsync).

So could I clone this bug report and assign this bug to both three package
>
>> According to  http://fedora.danny.cz/rsync/rsync-zlib-1.2.3.diff the diff 
>> between rsync and old upstream of zlib is pretty small
>
> I'm not 100% clear what that patch is supposed to do but the
> overwhelming bulk of it is coding style changes that will have no
> functional effect plus a reference to a header file which is not
> included in the diff.

The only difference of the bunded zlib on rsync  and zlib i the
Z_INSERT_ONLY mode .... Only a few lines, other is duplication of the
whole lib

Bastien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to