Hi Jonathan,
* Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]> [2011-01-13 08:53] wrote:
> However, pimd has a Conflicts on smcroute which is optional on all
> architectures, so this isn't a serious bug but it does violate a "should".
You are totally right. The thing is that I've (and upstream as well)
received several 'bug reports' from people saying that they are not
able to use smcroute or pimd in parallel. These packages are mutually
exclusive. So I went down the path of adding conflict to smcroute to
emphasize the fact, that they should not be used together.
I have to give another try to convince smcroute maintainer to go to
extra (with pimd to follow).
Thank you for you report,
Antonin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
