Micha Lenk <mi...@debian.org> wrote:

Hi,

> Thus I maintain my suggestion to add Provides:/Conflicts: dependencies to a
> virtual package (e.g. 'multicast-routing-daemon', but feel free to suggest
> another name).

You make a valid point wrt the kernel interface and I fully concur.

>> The proper thing to do here is to demote smcroute to Priority: extra and
>> leave pimd at Priority: optional.
>
> This would be fine with me as well.

Good; priority should be given to a "real" mc routing daemon, ie what
the user expects to get when she installs multicast-routing-daemon.

>> The pimd/xorp situation should be investigated, as I'm not sure both can
>> be installed at the same time either.
>
> They cannot because multicast routing always needs access to the multicast
> routing table (MRT), which the kernel lets you only access through a socket
> after calling setsockopt() with MRT_INIT (see above).

Yes, but it isn't as clear cut as it looks given xorp can do mc routing
or not depending on configuration (AIUI from the description). If that
is the case, you may want to use xorp for some tasks and pimd for mc
routing.

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE <jbla...@debian.org>  |  Debian, because code matters more 
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer        |       <http://www.debian.org>
 Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to