Peter Samuelson wrote: > It seems to me our whole problem is that the CPLAY_TMP dir is > unnecessary. mkfifo is just as atomic as mkdir. Both will fail > if anyone tries any funny business. > > So here is a much-simplifed 10_cplay-tmp.dpatch which I think is safe. > It's not tested, I don't know how to test security race patches except > to stare at them awhile and see if there are logic problems. Joey, > could you eyeball it please?
I agree, this patch looks good. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
