On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:41:48 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi Julien! > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:45:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> severity 609761 serious > > Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work > > Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical' > > > >> tags 609761 - squeeze > > Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work > > Removed tag(s) squeeze. > > Mmm, I do not understand why removing the squeeze tag.
The bug is not squeeze-specific, it also applies to sid. The squeeze tag wasn't appropriate. > I am perfectly > fine with Didier's NMU (which IMHO should not have been delayed at all), > which means that this bug will be fixed in 2 days: is this still a good > timeframe for squeeze or should I (or Didier) upload a new version *now* > (and better with urgency=high)? > Rescheduling Didier's upload would probably be a good idea. I can change urgency afterwards. Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
