Hello! On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:36:06PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > As learned from Bug#610781, i examine: > > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc2/i386/iso-cd/debian-squeeze-di-rc2-i386-businesscard.iso > (is rc1 still availiable ?)
I guess any of them works to reproduce the problem, but you can still get it from here: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-sq-di-rc1-i386-businesscard.iso > > /install is indeed empty. But the other two bear files. > I can see them by mount(8) of my elderly SuSE and by xorriso. > > Are there more differences between the tree of the mounted image > and the tree extracted by bsdtar ? > > Any idea where libarchive decides in its source code not to extract the > files ? (Somewhere in libarchive/archive_read_format_support_iso9660.c is all I can say for now, but I guess that doesn't help you...) > Is it known whether it uses Rock Ridge, Joliet or dull ISO/ECMA metadata ? > (Distinguishable when extracting long names with mixed case.) unless explicitly instructed to use something, this should be the order in which it tries to detect and use the extensions: joliet, rockridge, iso/ecma... Example, to skip any joliet metadata use: bsdtar --options !joliet ... > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > > > -- Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
