Hi, for additional consideration of any solution: the current binary pak- kage “mksh” comes with two shells “mksh” and “mksh-static”, and both are suitable for use as /bin/sh (mksh-static even more so on ports like m68k where the reduced startup time is noticeable).
So any solution should not use a binary package’s name as only key. (It was recently re-suggested I split mksh, but back when I first made the source package, waldi said binary packages are too expen- sive a ressource, so it was decided against. Unless there is demand for the split and an okay from ftpteam. Also, mksh-static is cur- rently using dietlibc if available, eglibc otherwise; I prefer to use klibc once it works though, so there will be three possibilities in the future – four might, if we get µClibc.) bye, //mirabilos -- 22:20⎜<asarch> The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master 22:21⎜<asarch> And the distance between the craziness and geniality is only measured by the success 22:21⎜<mksh> it’s a very thin line anyway… with some, you don’t know which side they’re on -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
