Hi Willem, JFTR, upstream is also working on something similar to our "split" proposal : http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/482 That would be nice if it's also supported by upstream and not only by Debian.
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 18:57:53, [email protected] a écrit : > > IMHO, we have to split actual opennebula package in something like : > Looks good, but see comments. > > > - libopennebula-ruby (all /usr/lib/one/ruby/ ? split client and server > > part ?) > it's about 600k ... I'd leave it one package Agreed. > > - opennebula-tools (onevm & others CLI tools) > or maybe opennebula-client > > - opennebula (oned, sched_mm and all /etc/one ) > opennebula-server? (which would recommend the client, I guess) That seems a little weird to install "opennebula-server" if its depends on "opennebula-client" :) That's why I would prefer to stick with a package named like "opennebula-tools"... > - opennebula > possibly meta-package containing dependencies for client+server, > or maybe a transitional package to opennebula-server and -client? Yep, I would vote for a meta-package. Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
