Le jeudi 17 févr. 2011 à 09:45:37 (+0100), Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le mercredi 16 février 2011 à 20:02 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : > > On 02/16/2011 06:02 PM, Julien Valroff wrote: > > > Though I have nothing against this removal, and though I agree this > > > package > > > should have been maintained by the GNOME team (I am sure Josselin thought > > > it > > > was the case): why was this request approved without any prior > > > agreement from the maintainer of the package (me in that case)? > > I am terribly sorry about asking for removal without checking. I assumed > this package was in pkg-gnome, and I see now that it doesn’t.
No need to be sorry, I was pretty sure you had assumed about pkg-gnome, and I must also admit it should have been there. > > > Isn't there any check made before removing a package from the archive to > > > ensure the request was actually my by the maintainer (in case of a RoM)? > > > > No idea about the above part... > > I think there is an alert sent to the maintainer (or is it through the > PTS?), saying that the removal was requested. But that doesn’t help when > FTP masters are ultra-fast ;) I was only alerted when the bug was closed by FTP masters, hence, it might indeed be an option in the PTS. I will check this ASAP as this might lead to abuses. Cheers, Julien -- ,''`. Julien Valroff ~ <[email protected]> ~ <[email protected]> : :' : Debian Developer & Free software contributor `. `' http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
