Sebastian Siewior schrieb am Freitag, den 04. März 2011: > Package: src:conntrack > Version: 1:1.0.0-1 > Severity: serious > > This package failed to build on all architetures [0] here a snippet from > sparc: > |checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > |checking for LIBNFNETLINK... yes > |checking for LIBNETFILTER_CONNTRACK... no > |configure: error: Package requirements (libnetfilter_conntrack >= 0.9.1) were > |not met: > | > |Requested 'libnetfilter_conntrack >= 0.9.1' but version of > |libnetfilter_conntrack is 0.0.101 > |You may find new versions of libnetfilter_conntrack at > |http://netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_conntrack/ > | > |Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > |installed software in a non-standard prefix. > | > |Alternatively, you may set the environment variables > |LIBNETFILTER_CONNTRACK_CFLAGS > |and LIBNETFILTER_CONNTRACK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > |See the pkg-config man page for more details. > |make: *** [debian/stamp-build] Error 1 > |dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > > [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=conntrack > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=conntrack&arch=sparc&ver=1%3A1.0.0-1&stamp=1299194858&file=log&as=raw Ah, in fact I didn't. I just missed to adapt the versioned build-depend. libnetfilter_conntrack 0.9.1 isn't build on all architectures yet.
Alex -- Alexander Wirt, formo...@formorer.de CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
