On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 08:45:17AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > >> What _I'd_ like someone to explain is why this package cannot just be > >> updated to include the security fix that has been in upstream for > >> *years*. Is it being maintained? > >> > > On Tue, 17 May 2005 19:20:09 +0200 you said: > > I'm these days recovering from a massive ext3 fs corruption. As soon > > as I have my laptop in conditions, I'll take care of this. > > I hope that you were able to recover from your filesystem corruption, > thats not fun. > > I am just following up on this bug, your last message was the middle > of May, a couple months ago. You said that as soon as you had your > filesystem problem resolved you would take care of this. Whats the > status?
I have recovered from the fs problem, thanks. Most data are OK. I probably won't use ext3 for a good while... Regarding that bug, I've been searching all slash CVS tree and mailing lists but I wasn't able to find this patch everyone is referring to (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160579;msg=42). AFAICT no security fix was mad available separately. If you have more info, _please_ let me know !! -- Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
