unmerge 614731 617761
retitle 614731 support for env var substitutions in .install (helps multiarch)
thanks

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:24:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >  - Is bumping the dpkg-dev dependency ok, or should we instead
> >    opportunistically detect the DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH field and fall back to
> >    /usr/lib otherwise?

> I've chosen to do both. This way, backporters can simply make a version
> of debhelper that drops the dependency, and it will fall back to
> non-multiarch behavior.

> >  - Do you think adding a new {misc:Pre-Depends} substvar is sensible here?
> >    Since no one will have this substvar anywhere yet, all affected packages
> >    will need to update debian/control, so arguably they could be updated to
> >    declare Pre-Depends: multiarch-support directly; but this would be less
> >    backportable, and it may be easier for tools to warn about an unused
> >    substvar than a missing pre-depends?

> It may be easier if those pre-depends later need to be removed (or
> changed). I've kept it for now.

> >  - What accompanying documentation would you like for this change?

> Taken care of.

> >  - How soon could we have this in unstable? :D

> After dpkg-dev gets in, and someone checks what's in git and makes sure
> it works, ideally.

Tested here, works ok.  It doesn't look like the separate patch from bug
#614731 has been applied; unmerging that report and giving it a clearer
title (I think that's a worthwhile feature for debhelper to have but it's
not directly support for "multiarch"; and anyway, it's a different feature
to the one that's been committed).

Now back to waiting for dpkg 1.16.0.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
[email protected]                                     [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to