Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Petri Lehtinen wrote: > > Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just > > libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev? > > According to the Debian Library Packaging guide [0] using the libfooX-dev > namescheme is preferred, but the other solution is good as well. (You may > also see it as a matter of taste).
Yes, I've read the guide. It just doesn't feel right to me to use the name libfooX-dev when libfooX-dev and libfooY-dev cannot be installed at the same time. But as you said, it's probably mostly a matter of taste. Hope you'll find a sponsor, I didn't when I packaged Jansson 1.3. The time for packaging Jansson is also better now as version 2.0 is out and not backward incompatible changes are going happen anytime soon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
