On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:14:19PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I would be happier if the prompt could say something like
> 
>       If the context does not require some specific language and the
>       user has not specified a dictionary in ~/.ispell-default,
>       ispell will fall back to using the default dictionary pointed
>       to by symlinks named default.aff and default.hash under
>       /usr/lib/ispell.

~/.ispell-default is only used by ispell-wrapper, not by ispell itself. I
should have put something about it in text.
 
>       Please indicate which dictionary should be used as a
>       system-wide default.  This determines the target of the
>       aforementioned symlinks and also sets a global emacs default.
> 
>       Use "Manual symlink setting" if you want to handle the
>       symlinks yourself.  There will be no global emacs default for
>       ispell in that case.
> 
> though I'm not sure whether that describes current application
> behavior well or not.

I like the second part, with some reference to ispell-wrapper added, 
but would make the first different. Symlinks will indeed be used only
when ispell is invoked without any "-d" option.

Something like

  When no explicit dictionary is specified on its invocation,
  ispell will fall back to using the default dictionary pointed
  to by symlinks named default.aff and default.hash under
  /usr/lib/ispell.

  Please indicate which dictionary should be used as a   
  system-wide default.  This determines the target of the
  aforementioned symlinks and also sets global ispell-wrapper 
  and Emacs defaults.
 
  Use "Manual symlink setting" if you want to handle the
  symlinks yourself.  There will be no global Emacs nor ispell-wrapper
  defaults for ispell in that case.

Thanks or your help. Comments are welcome.

-- 
Agustin




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to