On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:14:19PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I would be happier if the prompt could say something like > > If the context does not require some specific language and the > user has not specified a dictionary in ~/.ispell-default, > ispell will fall back to using the default dictionary pointed > to by symlinks named default.aff and default.hash under > /usr/lib/ispell.
~/.ispell-default is only used by ispell-wrapper, not by ispell itself. I should have put something about it in text. > Please indicate which dictionary should be used as a > system-wide default. This determines the target of the > aforementioned symlinks and also sets a global emacs default. > > Use "Manual symlink setting" if you want to handle the > symlinks yourself. There will be no global emacs default for > ispell in that case. > > though I'm not sure whether that describes current application > behavior well or not. I like the second part, with some reference to ispell-wrapper added, but would make the first different. Symlinks will indeed be used only when ispell is invoked without any "-d" option. Something like When no explicit dictionary is specified on its invocation, ispell will fall back to using the default dictionary pointed to by symlinks named default.aff and default.hash under /usr/lib/ispell. Please indicate which dictionary should be used as a system-wide default. This determines the target of the aforementioned symlinks and also sets global ispell-wrapper and Emacs defaults. Use "Manual symlink setting" if you want to handle the symlinks yourself. There will be no global Emacs nor ispell-wrapper defaults for ispell in that case. Thanks or your help. Comments are welcome. -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org