Hi Moritz,

I did run memtest for a day or so, without any findings. I did not repeat the 
test yet, as it appears a bit dangerous to me. After Ben's remark, I was 
wondering if perhaps the respective disk, or the IDE controller it is connected 
to, might have a hardware problem. This would not necessarily show up in 
everyday operation, as the operational system disk is connected via SATA. 
Certainly I will try with a later kernel version in a quiet minute!

Cheers,
Andreas.

Am 01.04.2011 um 21:35 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:

> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:20:00AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:41 +0200, Andreas Feldner wrote:
>>> Hi Ben,
>>> 
>>> somehow netconsole doesn't do anything for me. But it turned out the the 
>>> system behaviour is not exactly reproducible and anyway I can see the 
>>> messages 
>>> on screen if X is not started (because nvidia module banned ;-) ).
>>> 
>>> So, here I have the following error message, hope that helps!
>> [...]
>> 
>> OK, this looks really weird.  I looked for reports of similar crashes
>> and found <http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/11/302> which apparently turned
>> out to be due to a hardware fault.
>> 
>> Could you test Linux 2.6.36 as packaged in experimental?  If that has
>> the same problem, try running memtest86+ for a while to check whether
>> this is due to bad RAM.  I suspect it isn't, but we have to check.
> 
> Andreas, did you test later kernels (now also in unstable) and memtest?
> 
> Cheers,
>        Moritz





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to