On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> wrote: >> I didn't say I didn't want to fix it. > > You reassigned to bug, this means "it's not a problem I can fix".
I meant that time is better spent fixing this at a higher level. >> I asked what real problems it caused. > > It confuses users... it's cruft, it's not clean. How does it confuse users? > The severity might not be serious, it's still a bug. True >> I said this should IMO be solved at a higher-level. > > I say we're far from having it solved at a higher level, "declarative > diversions" are the subject of a GSoC but there's no plan currently to do > something similar with the alternatives. How far is far? To me, it sounds almost trivial. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
