reopen 621405
block 621405 by 621366
thank you

Hi Sergey,

please keep this bug open, so I can keep track of packages still using
the old libraries. I have added a blocked by apr-util bug for exactly
the same thing, so as soon as the apr-util get's fixed, you will be
able to do rebuild.

Thank you,
Ondrej

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 02:21, Debian Bug Tracking System
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the libapache2-mod-qos package:
>
> #621405: Still uses libdb4.8
>
> It has been closed by Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Sergey B Kirpichev 
> <[email protected]> by
> replying to this email.
>
>
> --
> 621405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621405
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact [email protected] with problems
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 04:18:52 +0400
> Subject: Re: Bug#621405: Still uses libdb4.8
> 2011/4/7 Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>:
>> Your package currently still uses Berkeley DB version 4.8 (libdb4.8).
>
> Yes, but it's not a direct dependence:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), apache2-prefork-dev (>= 2.2.3) |
> apache2-threaded-dev (>= 2.2.3), libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8g), libapr1-dev,
> libaprutil1-dev, libpcre3-dev, libpng12-dev, automake
>
> Probably, It's due to libaprutil1-dev.
>
> So, I'll close this bugreport.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Ondřej Surý" <[email protected]>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:57:16 +0200
> Subject: Still uses libdb4.8
> Package: libapache2-mod-qos
> Version: 9.54-2
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: db5.1
>
> Your package currently still uses Berkeley DB version 4.8 (libdb4.8).
>
> However, there is a newer Berkeley DB version in the archive (libdb5.1),
> with a compatible API.  Berkeley DB version 4.8 will be eventually
> removed from unstable in favor of version 5.1.
>
> Please port your package to libdb5.1 as soon as possible.  In most cases
> only change required is to update build depends from libdb4.8-dev
> to libdb-dev, or just recompile the package.
>
> More complicated scenarios:
>
> - Package does check for DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 - this should be updated
>  to (DB_VERSION_MAJOR > 4) || ((DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4) && (DB_VERSION_MINOR 
> >= XX)).
>
> - Configure checks - sometime there is a list of db-4.8 db-4.6 db-4.2, etc., 
> this
>  needs to be updated to just db (or db-5.1 db-5 db), or at least list the 'db'
>  in the front
>
> You can see example patch in cyrus-imapd-2.2:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.2.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/99-berkelydb-5.1.dpatch;hb=HEAD
>
> - The packages which use Berkeley DB transactional mode need to upgrade
>  the database files before the upgrade.  This is fairly straightforward
>  and is well documented on the Berkeley DB website.  But you probably
>  already know that because it's not the first Berkeley DB transition.
>
> The example script can be found in the cyrus-imapd-2.4 (not yet released):
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.4.git;a=blob;f=debian/cyrus-upgrade-db;hb=HEAD
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>  APT prefers maverick-updates
>  APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 
> 'maverick-proposed'), (500, 'maverick-backports'), (500, 'maverick')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
>
>
>



-- 
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
http://blog.rfc1925.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to