On dim., 2010-07-25 at 11:34 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Yves-Alexis Perez may or may not have written... > > > On sam., 2010-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: > >> thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided > >> by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: > >> blueman-sendto. > > >> Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop > >> with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to > >> blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the > >> addition of Conflicts headers). > > > What do you mean? That the sendto file should be added in Thunar or in > > blueman? > > Whichever's more practical. I mention it here because of > bluetooth-sendto.desktop. > > > I'm not strongly opposed to add one (though that should be done > > upstream, ideally), but at one point it's hard to say if thunar should ship > > sendto files for each and every application, or if each and every > > application should ship sendto files for each and every file manager (the > > best would be a common spec for sendto files, imho) > > The apps should, because there are more of them; but, either way, it becomes > a little silly if both blueman-sendo and bluetooth-sendto are available > (which, I suppose, could happen if you have different users who prefer > different desktop environments). It doesn't seem avoidable without extending > the specification or telling them to hide entries. > Could you craft such a blueman-sendto.desktop?
Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
