Looks like I didn't attach the patch... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 17:35, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > tags 621374 +patch > thank you > > Matthias, > > here is the patch. I have also checked the upstream of bsddb and > compared the version supporting the db5.1 to the one in python2.7 and > there is not code change related to forward compatibility (they just > introduce new functions), so it can be safely assumed that my patch + > recompile should work. > > Do you want similar check and patches for python2.[56]? > > Ondrej > > 2011/4/7 Matthias Klose <[email protected]>: >> tag 621374 + wontfix help >> thanks >> >> On 06.04.2011 22:57, Ondřej Surý wrote: >>> Package: python2.7 >>> Version: 2.7.1-6 >>> Severity: normal >>> User: [email protected] >>> Usertags: db5.1 >>> >>> Your package currently still uses Berkeley DB version 4.8 (libdb4.8). >>> >>> However, there is a newer Berkeley DB version in the archive (libdb5.1), >>> with a compatible API. Berkeley DB version 4.8 will be eventually >>> removed from unstable in favor of version 5.1. >>> >>> Please port your package to libdb5.1 as soon as possible. In most cases >>> only change required is to update build depends from libdb4.8-dev >>> to libdb-dev, or just recompile the package. >> >> no, please send a patch. I don't plan to upgrade python2.7 to use anything >> newer >> than 4.8 for the wheezy release. python3 does build with db5.1, but only uses >> the Berkley DB for the dbm module. >> >> Matthias >> > > > > -- > Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> > http://blog.rfc1925.org/ >
-- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> http://blog.rfc1925.org/
python2.7-bdb5.1.patch
Description: Binary data
