On 04/13/2011 08:58 PM, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > during a recent list conversion to mlmmj i've run into a number of > issues where the mlmmj documentation isn't complete, missing or incorrect.
Hi. Thanks a lot for all this, it is very interesting, important and helpful. I will definitively try to pay attention to all your suggestions, and will fix all. > that's it for now; i've given this severity=normal because i think some > of those missing info bits affect a smooth deployment of mlmmj quite badly. Sorry, but I don't agree with that. I've set it to wishlist, as this is what it deserves for an issue with documentation. Note that I really think that maintenance work on bug issues wont depend on the severity (at least, it shouldn't), and even with severity wishlist, I will work on it as soon as I have a bit of free time (which I believe will be quite soonish). By the way, this package is team maintained, and currently, I'm the only active DD behind it. I think MLMMJ deserves more love: it's to me the best list manager ever. So if you'd like to help, that'd be great as well (our Alioth group and git are open to contributions). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
