On 2011-04-17 16:01, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> We needed to go this way as an InRelease file is always trusted and we
> want to have untrusted InRelease files.

You could implement this without touching the syntax of present
'Release' files.

> > As you pointed already, current API of libcupt is not ready to such a
> > change, I didn't predict anyone will need more than one Release
> > file per index line. The fix will wait for an API breakage.

> That seems a bit strange given that InRelease files were introduced in
> November 2009[1].
> 
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/11/msg00001.html

Okay. I remember I had read this mail, but the relevant section didn't
get my attention. It's my fault then.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to