Am 17.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Torsten Landschoff: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 16:10 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >>> I am sorry to say that it is non-trivial to merge a fix to this bug. >>> Upstream revision 12620 contains the fix according to the upstream bug. >>> However, the fix is not released yet and will only make it into SWIG >>> 2.0.4 which accumulated a lot of changes already. >>> >>> I don't feel like releasing a package for that before it is released >>> upstream. > >> And updating the package to 2.0.3 and add the change as patch? > > There is actually a package of 2.0.3, please install swig2.0. I did not > move swig to point to swig2.0 yet as that breaks many packages - the > autoconf-archive detection of swig is broken and thinks 2.0 is older > than 1.3.x :-(
Just a little update, I also tried it out with the swig2.0 package, same
error as with swig.
>
> Now that squeeze is released I should really start that transition...
>
> Unfortunately, the diff of r12620 does not apply to swig 2.0.3 as it
> depends on a bunch of other changes.
Packaging a VCS snapshot of swig2.0? :)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
