On 04/18/2011 07:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Josip Rodin ([email protected]): > >> You don't have to do anything extreme, just add a single simple note to >> NEWS.Debian saying "Between oldstable and stable, behavior X changed in a >> way that may break Y, so if you depend on it, read the new manual". >> >> I fail to see any downside to what I proposed. Is there actually one? > > I'm OK with a note in NEWS.Debian. My concern is more where to draw > the line. Let's say that, because a user that I am confident into > (happens to be you, Josip...:-)) asks for this, this should be OK. > > Let's put this in the TODO pile....but now I go back fighting with > 3.6.0..:-)
I guess we should document to run testparm and look at the upstream changelog for more details when doing major upgrades. The 'map untrusted to domain' was introduced as a result of my group at the university complaining to upstream that our usecase (similar to the one of Josip) did not work anymore. From an upstream's pov it's only logical to default the option to no btw. But I think it's probably a use case that is more common for Debian users and should probably be mentioned explicitly. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
