On 2011-04-19T21:14:09+0200, Axel Beckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > severity 602186 normal
> > Bug #602186 [debian-goodies] checkrestart: use service instead of direct 
> > call of initscript
> > Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist'
> > 
> > > merge 592436 602186
> > Bug#592436: checkrestart: invoke-rc.d in preference of directly running the 
> > init script
> > Bug#602186: checkrestart: use service instead of direct call of initscript
> > Merged 592436 602186.
> 
> I'm sorry, but those two bugreports are definitely not the same. They
> argue about the same thing, but they head towards two different
> solutions.
> 
> And #602186 is not more than a wishlist bug. "service" is far from
> being a standard like invoke-rc.d is. 
> 
> The standard for maintainer scripts is to use invoke-rc.d and calling
> the init.d script directly if that command is not available.
> 
> But checkrestart's output is not for maintainer scripts, so IMHO, Jörg
> (submitter of #602186) has a valid point when he says that "service"
> may be better suited for manual calling by admins as it seems to clean
> up the environment first.
> 
> Javier: What do you think about this?

I would prefer the output to use "service". I usually use service
rather than copying and pasting the /etc/init.d output of
checkrestart. Other distributions have a service command too (it comes
from Red Hat), so I like the consistency it gives, in addition to the
environment cleanup.

-- 
Kenyon Ralph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to