Bryan McLellan escreveu isso aí: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Antonio Terceiro > <terce...@softwarelivre.org> wrote: > > This other patch fixes the problem in a even better (an unintrusive) > > way. > > Is this a problem that is unique to ruby-yajl, or one that may come up > for other packages?
This problem will happen with any upstream packages that do not build correctly, and is not specific to Ruby of gem2deb. In such cases, we must help upstream to fix their build system, and not add workarounds to our tools. > It's possible we can get upstream to rename the extension, but I > wonder if this is something that gem2deb should know how to deal with. Please read the last patch I sent. It is a one-line change, and does not require renaming the extension at all. I can't imagine a reason why upstream would reject it. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@softwarelivre.org> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
