Hi Agustin, On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:50:40AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > I am cc'ing you for your POV about the possibility of a package shipping > alternative entries for /usr/share/pam-configs, see below. That is not my > currently preferred option, but would like to know your opinion first.
> Previous info, > libpam-encfs needed /etc/pam.d/common-auth modification. This > is already managed automatically by means of pam-auth-update. > There is also common-session. There are two ways of unmounting encrypted > volume, using idle option so it is unmounted after Xmin idle or adding a > session line. The second disables the first. So, session line may or may > not be added to common-session. If wanting to do this automatically two > alternative snippets may be used, and I would like to know if something like > this has been considered and your opinion about that possibility. I see that you've already closed this bug with a documentation update only, but for the record: yes, you can ship multiple optional configs for the same module. If you do this, at most one of the configs should be marked 'Default: yes', and each of the configs should declare that it 'Conflicts' with the others. See <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PAMConfigFrameworkSpec> for full details (sorry, haven't incorporated this documentation into the pam package yet). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
