On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:13:24PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: openssl > > Version: 1.0.0d-2 > > Severity: important > > Tags: patch > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: sparc64 > > > > openssl FTBFS on sparc64 with a testsuite failure. This is due to a > > small configuration issue, fixed by the patch below. I changed > > SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG into BN_LLONG, as it is done for debian-sparc-v9 or > > solaris64-sparc-v9. Could you please apply this patch in the next > > upload. Thanks in advance. > > What is the size of a "long"? 64 bit? Then as far as I know you > should use SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG.
Yes, the size of a long is 64 bit. If in this case SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG should be used, do you know why solaris64-sparcv9-gcc, solaris64-sparcv9-cc, BSD-sparc64 and linux64-sparcv9 use BN_LLONG? I basically did the change based on them, and it fixed the testsuite issue. > If long is 64 bit, as it is on most of our 64 bit ports, I would > look into why it's failing instead. > The problem is that test BN_add. I will try to investigate why. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
