> Da: Pierre JUILLARD <[email protected]>
> Oggetto: Re: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for > 
> engineering simulations
> A: "Adam C Powell IV" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], "Nicolas > 
> Chauvat" <[email protected]>
> Data: Martedì 10 maggio 2011, 14:52

> Maybe the best thing to do:
> - trying to compile Code-Aster with metis-edf and seeing how many test cases 
> fail
> - trying to compile Code-Aster with metis and seeing how many test cases fail
> 
> I wouldn't be surprised if there was no differences...

Hi,

I also have the feeling that nothing would change; moreover, I also think
that CA can be built (and work) with scotchmetis instead of metis.
At the moment I'm not completely sure wether linking against metis is
really required or not; I've also asked on the forum[1], but had no
answer.
So, when 10.4 will come out, I think I'll try in the first place
to build with scotchmetis, and if this will work - bith the compilation
and the validation tests - I'll also try to build without scotchmetis.
If metis/metis-edf is only called via an external program, we could
upload code-aster in the main section, upload metis-edf on non-free and
make it a recommended/suggested dependance... right?

Bye
Andrea




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to