Source: bobcat
Followup-For: Bug #602817

gcc-help discussion starts at:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-05/msg00352.html

the point is to reveal how guilty is the compiler (if at all)
for not ignoring inline request with virtual methods on armel
when there is no meaningful way to actually inline them.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to