also sprach Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> [2011.05.28.2013 +0200]: > docutils-doc: > - ships documentation > - recommends "python-docutils | python3-docutils"
Why the recommendation? > Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? Does it sound sensible? Yes, it does. Thanks! > - "python-docutils | python3-docutils" is a bit cumbersome to type, > maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say: > "docutils")? Do they have the same "API"? Are they interchangeable? > - What about existing virtual packages? python-docutils currently > provides docutils-writer-manpage, docutils-writer-odt, > python-odtwriter, rst2man, rst2odt. The odt ones are unused, there > are 3 reverse build-dependencies for man ones. I'm a bit tempted > to drop all of them entirely. +1 -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
